Hare krsna Maharaj, PAMHO, AGTSP
this question should have been either in chapter class or module review class, in BHVAI canto 4.
This is regarding offence of Surici against Dhruv Maharaj.
http://vedabase.com/en/sb/4/9/23 says "When Suruci insulted Dhruva Mahārāja, he was just a child. She of course did not know that Dhruva was a great recognized Vaiṣṇava, and so her offense was committed unknowingly. When one serves a Vaiṣṇava unknowingly, one still gets the good result, and if one unknowingly insults a Vaiṣṇava, one suffers the bad result."
But Surici offended him when Dhruv ji was not a vaisnava. What was the fault of Uttama, he was younger than Dhruv Maharaj, he did not even insult him.
we are asking this because every one is potential vaisnava. but he follow Ksatriya rules it is ok to insult opponent as a sport. so is it that all insult we have done to people would be treated as vaisnava apradh.
trying to run with small steps
dwarf
HpS - ASA - AGTSP paoho. Hmmmm! We guess that Dhruva Maharaja was a "vaisnava" right from the very beginning. As soon as he had information that the best way to solve his problems was to go to Visnu he accepted the offering with full determination. He could have thought, "No, that's to hard! I will do it myself. I am more than the almighty God. I will corrupt my brother by starting with offering him chocolates. Haw! Haw! Hawww....". So he took to Visnu worship, and he didn't know about love God as an option, no? Did Narada Prabhu give him that option?
Yes, it seems that maybe we should not go to the Temple because there we might commit some unconscious offense to some one and if we stay in hell then we won't commit any Vaisnava aparada. Ha! Ha! Hare!!!! Guess, this is just the way it is. What we want is at the Temple so we HAVE to go, but.... we have to be careful! Then Uttam, brother. Maybe he was guilty because he didn't protest the treatment of his brother. Laksman, Bharata, they didn't tolerate the mistreatment of their Brother... Hmmmm